SANDY INGRAM: ⚠️ Iraqi Dinar RV Rumors vs Reality: Why Some Say “Not Yet” 🇮🇶💱

1 week ago 4
ARTICLE AD BOX

🧩 A Different Voice in the RV Space

While many dinar watchers are focused on January 2026 RV rumors, analyst Sandy Ingram offers a very different — and controversial — perspective.

🗣️ “Iraq is not in a financial or economic position to revalue at this time.”

Her comments have sparked debate across the dinar community, especially among those waiting for an imminent RV.


💰 The “Loose Ends” Argument

According to Sandy, Iraq faces major unresolved issues:

🌍 Millions of Dinars Outside Iraq

  • Large quantities of IQD remain outside the country

  • Creates uncertainty for monetary control

🏦 Lack of Trust in Iraqi Banks

📌 Key question she raises:

How can a country revalue if its citizens don’t trust the banking system?


🔢 “Deleting the Zeros” — Not What Many Think

One of Sandy’s strongest points challenges a common RV rumor:

🚫 Removing the zeros ≠ Revaluation

She explains:

  • Deleting zeros is a redenomination

  • It changes the face value, not the real value

  • Example:

    • 1,000 old dinars → 1 new dinar

    • Purchasing power stays the same

📉 No gain.
📉 No windfall.
📉 No RV.

👉 This is why she says deleting zeros alone is not evidence of an impending RV.


🖨️ No New Currency Printed?

Another key claim:

🧾 “There has been no budget, no announcement, and no confirmed creation of new denominations.”

She adds that Iraq has:

  • Talked about deleting zeros for nearly 20 years

  • Never executed it

  • Never funded a full currency replacement program

📌 From her view, this weakens the “RV is imminent” narrative.


🤔 Why This Matters to RV Watchers

Even for those who believe strongly in the RV, Sandy’s position highlights risks:

⚠️ Rumors vs mechanics
⚠️ Hope vs banking reality
⚠️ Timing vs readiness

Her stance reminds investors that:

  • Not every reform leads to revaluation

  • Administrative changes ≠ value increase

  • Structural trust matters more than headlines


🧠 RV Community Reality Check

✔ Other gurus see signals, alignment, and targets
✔ Sandy sees unresolved fundamentals
✔ Both perspectives exist simultaneously

📌 For rumor-followers:
This doesn’t “kill” the RV narrative — it slows expectations and reframes timelines.


⭐  Featured Snippet 

Sandy Ingram says deleting zeros in Iraq is not revaluation and warns that lack of banking trust and dinars outside the country may delay any RV.


🔮 Final Thought

The Iraqi dinar conversation lives between:
🔥 Speculation
⚙️ Mechanics
🕰️ Timing

Some hear “any moment now”
Others hear “not ready yet”

And the truth?
👉 The RV won’t happen on belief alone — it happens when structure forces it.


🔥 Hashtags

#IraqiDinar
#DinarRV
#RVRumors
#DeleteTheZeros
#IQDReality
#CurrencyReform

 Sandy Ingram  

 Iraq is not in a financial economic position to revalue at this time.  There's too many loose ends on the table.  One of the loose problems is us There are millions of dinars outside the country.  One of the other major problems is the Iraqi people will not place their IQD into the Iraqi banks.  How is a country going to revalue or do almost anything if the population will not put their money into the bank?

They've been talking about deleting the zeros for almost 20 years and it has never happened.  They still have not created a new denominational bill. There's been no talk and no budget for recreating currency and you know...I would tell you if that ever happened... There is a misconception going around...about removing zeros from the 

currency...They're saying this is evidence of impending revaluation.  That is not true.  Removing zeros, redenomination, is an administrative process that changes the face value of the currency without changing its actual value.  If Iraq removed zeros, 1,000 old dinars would become 1 new dinar.  But the purchasing power remains identical.
  The value of the currency remains identical. That's why [we] have never taken the removing the zeros as a significant news story to be pounded on as a revaluation.  Because it's not. 

Read Entire Article