"You can't address a fundamental problem by making marginal changes."

Here's the basic problem with David Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill:
"You can't address a fundamental problem by making marginal changes."Its remarkable timidity is its underlying flaw. It either makes fundamental change, so is worth passing, or it doesn't — which is now how Seymour is left to defend it. If it doesn't, then one is left to wonder: what's the point?

The defence, however noble, is not helped by the apparent illiteracy of attackers who impute everything into the bland legalese every imaginary vice they can dream up.